Peter Van Dyck was classically trained in the The Florence Academy of Art, Florence, Italy 1998-2001 and now is an adjunct Faculty at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts in Philadelphia. He shows at the Artists’ House Gallery in Philadelphia and the The Grenning Gallery, Sag Harbor, NY. I first saw his work as part of the Perceptual Painters website that I wrote about in a previous post a couple of years ago. I was impressed then and now with his fined honed traditional painting skills especially with regard to the light and geometry of his paintings. His recent paintings impress me by his investigation of new ways of put together a painting from observation. I’m attracted to paintings, such as these, that take risks and are willing to leave the comfort zones of accomplished technique and never settle for just making clones from pot-boiling formulas. I was very pleased when Peter agree to answer a few questions for this blog about his work in an email a couple of days ago.
Larry Groff From what I’ve seen on your website your work seems to be starting to veer away from a classical realism to more modernist leanings. I see a greater emphasis on the surface, flatter shapes and painterly handling in general. I’m curious if you can say anything about this evolution of your work.
Peter Van Dyck I’m very pleased that you see this evolution in my work. Ironically, I think this “modernist” seed was planted in my “classical realist” training: I had what might be referred to as a neo-traditionalist atelier education but it happened to be one that emphasized an optical, shape based approach to representation (Vermeer as opposed to David). However, shape design was still taught mostly as a threshold to describing form, a necessary step so that one could model. But I did see people in school whose work had an assertive shape life and I guess I was attracted to that. So, gradually, shape design became (I think) the dominant organizational and expressive force in my paintings (perhaps at the expense of form) and as I have recently started to let myself go a little, I guess this interest has come forward even more. The same could be said about the paint handling and the surface that it generates.
LG What issues are you currently thinking about with these new landscapes like the corner of ripka and wilde streets and ripka st. porches?
PVD As far as the approach goes in the paintings you refer to (as well as the other recent urban landscapes): most of the subjects I used to paint were highly controlled and I really made an attempt to be a kind of “objective” human camera obscura, to copy the picture plane (I was not very good at it). But in the past couple years, especially when painting the city, I started to construct the painting from the ground up out of the perceptual elements that I was attracted to (I don’t know why it took me so long to figure this out). Then, the accumulation of the elements that I was perceiving and the orchestration of them as forces in the painting would start to build into something that in a surprising way got at my pleasure of the place or thing that I was looking at and was in no way a facsimile of the picture plane. I know that is all painting 101 but it was a genuine discovery for me
Also, these are the first paintings I have painted exclusively to please myself. When I was in school and for a good while after I left I was deeply influenced by my teachers and I think I always somehow painted to please them or to meet what I imagined to be their standards or expectations. Then for a while there were some galleries that were showing and selling my work and of course that had its own pressures. It was a blessing in disguise for me when the galleries that I worked with decided that I wasn’t good anymore. All of a sudden, I was really painting for fun and to make something that I wanted to keep for myself.
LG Who are some of your greatest influences?
PVD My influences are pretty obvious I’m afraid….Vermeer, Corot, Sargent, Antonio Lopez to name a few. I’m really inspired by a lot of contemporary people off in their own corners of the world making fresh energetic interpretations of their environments (thank god for the internet!) as well as my students at PAFA who are always better at doing what I tell them to do than I am.
LG Anything note worthy about your palette or technique that might be of interest to viewers?
PVD As far as my technique is concerned, I paint very directly with very little foresight and planning. I really don’t have any hard and fast rules, except to do whatever it takes to enjoy myself when I’m painting.
LG Your paintings all appear to be made from observation, do you use the sight-size method? How important is that to you?
PVD I work from direct observation but recently I have begun to work from memory as well a bit. I can only work from memory for a little while though before I run out of ideas. I was trained in the sight-size method but I haven’t worked that way for a few years now; for a number of reasons I think it would take me away from where I want to go.
LG Do you make drawings and studies for your paintings or just work it out on the painting itself?
PVD I don’t make drawings for the paintings. I tend to get excited about painting and then just want to start right in and fight it out on the painting.
LG Thank you Peter for taking the time to share your thoughts with us.
Donate to Painting Perceptions
Donations to Painting Perceptions helps this site greatly, please consider your gift today.